PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OI vs. LZB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OI vs. LZB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) and La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OI achieves a -46.00% return, which is significantly lower than LZB's -1.38% return. Over the past 10 years, OI has underperformed LZB with an annualized return of -8.32%, while LZB has yielded a comparatively higher 5.14% annualized return.


OI

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.03%
YTD
-46.00%
6M
-42.91%
1Y
-38.46%
3Y*
-28.70%
5Y*
-16.16%
10Y*
-8.32%

LZB

1D
-0.44%
1M
8.81%
YTD
-1.38%
6M
-7.43%
1Y
-10.40%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
-1.01%
10Y*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OI vs. LZB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OI
O-I Glass, Inc.
-46.00%36.16%-33.82%-1.15%37.74%1.09%0.16%-29.69%-22.24%27.34%
LZB
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
-1.38%-12.49%20.43%65.68%-35.50%-7.35%27.93%15.50%-9.75%2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between OI and LZB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 1991

0.31

The correlation between OI and LZB shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OI:

$1.22B

LZB:

$1.50B

EPS

OI:

-$0.96

LZB:

$2.02

PS Ratio

OI:

0.19

LZB:

0.71

PB Ratio

OI:

0.54

LZB:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

OI:

$6.40B

LZB:

$2.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OI:

$1.03B

LZB:

$924.91M

EBITDA (TTM)

OI:

$657.00M

LZB:

$216.98M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OI vs. LZB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OI
OI Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
OI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
OI Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

LZB
LZB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LZB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LZB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LZB Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
LZB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
LZB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OI vs. LZB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) and La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILZBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.98

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

-0.37

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

-0.78

-0.84

OI vs. LZB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OI Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the LZB Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OI and LZB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILZBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

-0.28

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

-0.03

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

0.13

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.16

-0.18

Drawdowns

OI vs. LZB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OI drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, roughly equal to the maximum LZB drawdown of -97.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OI and LZB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILZBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.73%

-97.65%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.07%

-28.38%

-23.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.88%

-37.87%

-28.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.00%

-47.14%

-18.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.56%

-55.01%

-26.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.42%

-21.70%

-64.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.20%

-27.20%

-26.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.83%

13.94%

+9.89%

Volatility

OI vs. LZB - Volatility Comparison

O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) at 8.60%. This indicates that OI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILZBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.01%

8.60%

+5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.43%

21.09%

+15.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.12%

37.76%

+8.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.26%

36.99%

+7.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.47%

39.34%

+9.13%

Dividends

OI vs. LZB - Dividend Comparison

OI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LZB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LZB
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
2.61%2.42%1.88%2.02%2.96%1.69%0.88%1.68%1.77%1.44%1.32%1.39%
OI
O-I Glass, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.42%1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OI vs. LZB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between O-I Glass, Inc. and La-Z-Boy Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.54B
541.59M
(OI) Total Revenue
(LZB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OI vs. LZB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between O-I Glass, Inc. and La-Z-Boy Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
12.9%
43.1%
Portfolio components
OI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O-I Glass, Inc. reported a gross profit of 199.00M and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.

LZB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, La-Z-Boy Incorporated reported a gross profit of 233.51M and revenue of 541.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.1%.

OI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O-I Glass, Inc. reported an operating income of 91.00M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.

LZB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, La-Z-Boy Incorporated reported an operating income of 29.81M and revenue of 541.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

OI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O-I Glass, Inc. reported a net income of -35.00M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of -2.3%.

LZB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, La-Z-Boy Incorporated reported a net income of 21.65M and revenue of 541.59M, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OI and LZB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OI has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to LZB (8.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OI dropped -94.73% vs LZB's -97.65%.

LZB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OI and LZB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer