OI vs. PG
OI (O-I Glass, Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. OI operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, OI returned -8.32%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for PG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OI vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OI achieves a -46.00% return, which is significantly lower than PG's -0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, OI has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -8.32%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.36% annualized return.
OI
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.03%
- YTD
- -46.00%
- 6M
- -42.91%
- 1Y
- -38.46%
- 3Y*
- -28.70%
- 5Y*
- -16.16%
- 10Y*
- -8.32%
PG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- YTD
- -0.74%
- 6M
- -3.04%
- 1Y
- -13.56%
- 3Y*
- 1.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
OI vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OI O-I Glass, Inc. | -46.00% | 36.16% | -33.82% | -1.15% | 37.74% | 1.09% | 0.16% | -29.69% | -22.24% | 27.34% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | -0.74% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between OI and PG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 1991 | 0.21 |
The correlation between OI and PG shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OI:
$1.22B
PG:
$338.77B
OI:
-$0.96
PG:
$5.23
OI:
0.19
PG:
3.93
OI:
0.54
PG:
6.28
OI:
$6.40B
PG:
$86.72B
OI:
$1.03B
PG:
$43.64B
OI:
$657.00M
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OI vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
OI
PG
OI vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OI | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.89 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.87 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | -1.45 | -0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OI | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | -0.75 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.18 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.44 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.46 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
OI vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OI drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OI and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OI | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.73% | -54.25% | -40.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.07% | -15.66% | -36.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.88% | -21.15% | -44.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.00% | -23.77% | -42.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.56% | -23.77% | -57.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.42% | -18.75% | -67.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -12.16% | -41.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.83% | 9.64% | +14.19% |
Volatility
OI vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
O-I Glass, Inc. (OI) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.16%. This indicates that OI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OI | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.01% | 6.16% | +7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.43% | 14.82% | +21.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.12% | 18.24% | +27.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.26% | 17.70% | +26.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.47% | 19.00% | +29.47% |
Dividends
OI vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
OI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OI O-I Glass, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.04% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
OI vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between O-I Glass, Inc. and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OI vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
OI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O-I Glass, Inc. reported a gross profit of 199.00M and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
OI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O-I Glass, Inc. reported an operating income of 91.00M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
OI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, O-I Glass, Inc. reported a net income of -35.00M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of -2.3%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OI and PG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OI has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to PG (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OI dropped -94.73% vs PG's -54.25%.
PG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OI and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer