LZB vs. VOO
LZB (La-Z-Boy Incorporated) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, LZB returned 5.14%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LZB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LZB achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LZB has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 5.14%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
LZB
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 6M
- -7.43%
- 1Y
- -10.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
LZB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZB La-Z-Boy Incorporated | -1.38% | -12.49% | 20.43% | 65.68% | -35.50% | -7.35% | 27.93% | 15.50% | -9.75% | 2.15% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LZB and VOO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LZB and VOO has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LZB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
LZB
VOO
LZB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LZB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.43 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.16 | -3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 14.73 | -15.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LZB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 2.39 | -2.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.83 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | 0.87 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.89 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
LZB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LZB drawdown since its inception was -97.65%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LZB and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LZB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.65% | -33.99% | -63.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.38% | -8.90% | -19.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.87% | -18.69% | -19.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.14% | -24.52% | -22.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.01% | -33.99% | -21.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.70% | -0.70% | -21.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.20% | -3.69% | -23.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.94% | 1.91% | +12.03% |
Volatility
LZB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) has a higher volatility of 8.60% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that LZB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LZB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.60% | 2.84% | +5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.09% | 8.90% | +12.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.76% | 11.80% | +25.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.99% | 16.81% | +20.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.34% | 18.01% | +21.33% |
Dividends
LZB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
LZB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LZB La-Z-Boy Incorporated | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.88% | 2.02% | 2.96% | 1.69% | 0.88% | 1.68% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.32% | 1.39% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LZB and VOO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LZB has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LZB dropped -97.65% vs VOO's -33.99%.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LZB and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer