OGIG vs. NACP
OGIG (O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF) and NACP (Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OGIG tracks the O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index while NACP tracks the Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OGIG returned -2.07%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for NACP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OGIG charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NACP.
Performance
OGIG vs. NACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGIG achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.
OGIG
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -10.93%
- 1Y
- -6.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- -2.07%
- 10Y*
- —
NACP
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.18%
- 6M
- 20.98%
- 1Y
- 43.81%
- 3Y*
- 27.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- —
OGIG vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | -9.21% | 14.39% | 25.97% | 50.25% | -50.64% | -9.30% | 107.92% | 36.90% | -23.60% |
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 22.18% | 21.38% | 23.93% | 29.69% | -23.05% | 27.62% | 26.00% | 30.74% | -8.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between OGIG and NACP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between OGIG and NACP shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OGIG vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OGIG
NACP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OGIG
NACP
Communication Services
OGIG
NACP
Consumer Cyclical
OGIG
NACP
Industrials
OGIG
NACP
Healthcare
OGIG
NACP
Real Estate
OGIG
NACP
Financial Services
OGIG
NACP
Basic Materials
OGIG
-
NACP
Consumer Defensive
OGIG
-
NACP
Energy
OGIG
-
NACP
Utilities
OGIG
-
NACP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGIG vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank
OGIG
NACP
OGIG vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OGIG | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.54 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 4.56 | -4.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 20.04 | -20.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OGIG | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 3.14 | -3.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.92 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.93 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
OGIG vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGIG drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGIG and NACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGIG | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -30.96% | -35.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.23% | -9.65% | -23.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.23% | -19.66% | -13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.79% | -27.89% | -34.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.99% | -0.13% | -24.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -5.75% | -19.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.84% | 2.19% | +13.65% |
Volatility
OGIG vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison
O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) at 4.44%. This indicates that OGIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OGIG | NACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 4.44% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 11.13% | +7.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 14.02% | +8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.58% | 17.47% | +14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.03% | 18.70% | +12.33% |
OGIG vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OGIG has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
OGIG vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison
OGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than NACP's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NACP Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF | 0.55% | 0.62% | 2.96% | 1.28% | 3.48% | 3.06% | 1.48% | 1.22% | 0.71% |
OGIG O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OGIG and NACP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OGIG has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to NACP (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OGIG dropped -66.05% vs NACP's -30.96%.
On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs -2.07% for OGIG. On fees, OGIG is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, NACP has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs -2.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OGIG is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.
NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.08% for OGIG.
OGIG tracks O’Shares Global Internet Giants Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OGIG and 0.49% for NACP.
NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OGIG and NACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer