PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OGC.TO vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

OGC.TO is traded in CAD, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OGC.TO achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.26% return. Over the past 10 years, OGC.TO has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 9.12%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 65.70% annualized return.


OGC.TO

1D
-2.99%
1M
-4.92%
6M
-22.98%
YTD
-12.65%
1Y
80.83%
3Y*
61.41%
5Y*
36.37%
10Y*
9.12%
ALL TIME*
6.51%

NVDA

1D
2.75%
1M
0.22%
6M
9.21%
YTD
10.26%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
66.23%
5Y*
63.34%
10Y*
65.70%
ALL TIME*
37.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$35.84BCA$36.87BCA$44.41B
CA$25.14MCA$26.51MCA$31.95M

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corporation
-12.65%227.48%57.16%-1.22%17.27%-10.57%-3.53%-48.74%54.71%-17.19%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.26%32.57%194.22%230.95%-47.11%125.37%117.02%69.65%-25.00%69.67%

Correlation

The correlation between OGC.TO and NVDA is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2007

0.08

The correlation between OGC.TO and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (10 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OGC.TO:

CA$7.52B

NVDA:

$4.86T

EPS

OGC.TO:

$1.94

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

OGC.TO:

12.42

NVDA:

30.73

PEG Ratio

OGC.TO:

0.03

NVDA:

0.17

PS Ratio

OGC.TO:

4.20

NVDA:

19.35

PB Ratio

OGC.TO:

2.28

NVDA:

25.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

OGC.TO:

$2.25B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OGC.TO:

$1.24B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

OGC.TO:

$1.22B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OGC.TO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OGC.TO
OGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
OGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
OGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
OGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
OGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OGC.TONVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.09

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

0.70

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.93

1.44

+2.48

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OGC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OGC.TO and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -96.53%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -80.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGC.TO and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OGC.TONVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.53%

-80.18%

-16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.12%

-20.81%

-25.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.12%

-38.45%

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.87%

-63.60%

+16.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.12%

-63.60%

-12.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.63%

-12.84%

-28.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.05%

-28.39%

-11.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.65%

10.09%

+10.56%

Volatility

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.06%. This indicates that OGC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OGC.TONVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.36%

12.06%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.23%

28.25%

+11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.70%

36.08%

+16.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.96%

52.30%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.53%

50.57%

+1.96%

Dividends

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

OGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
OGC.TO
OceanaGold Corporation
0.98%0.29%0.23%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.26%0.27%0.46%0.63%

Financials

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OceanaGold Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. OGC.TO values in CAD, NVDA values in USD

OGC.TO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OceanaGold Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

OGC.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a gross profit of 397.08M and revenue of 702.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

OGC.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported an operating income of 330.79M and revenue of 702.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.1%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

OGC.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a net income of 224.66M and revenue of 702.79M, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OGC.TO and NVDA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OGC.TO and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer