PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEPIX vs. SRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEPIX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEPIX achieves a 61.97% return, which is significantly higher than SRV's 31.90% return. Over the past 10 years, OEPIX has underperformed SRV with an annualized return of -9.97%, while SRV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.


OEPIX

1D
1.93%
1M
-16.87%
YTD
61.97%
6M
62.75%
1Y
127.51%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
-9.97%

SRV

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
31.90%
6M
35.27%
1Y
41.53%
3Y*
29.19%
5Y*
25.87%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEPIX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OEPIX
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund
61.97%-1.85%-15.41%-3.76%88.50%14.90%-67.53%-4.45%-58.58%-22.70%
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
31.90%5.05%50.70%19.88%20.11%50.45%-41.65%33.99%-21.61%-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between OEPIX and SRV is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.46

The correlation between OEPIX and SRV shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEPIX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEPIX
OEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
OEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
OEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SRV
SRV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEPIX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OEPIXSRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.08

3.18

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.87

9.03

+8.84

OEPIX vs. SRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the SRV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEPIX and SRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OEPIX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than SRV's maximum drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEPIX and SRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEPIXSRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.94%

-92.97%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.19%

-13.13%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.50%

-26.26%

-39.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.50%

-26.26%

-39.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.69%

-81.70%

-14.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.60%

-7.98%

-83.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.98%

-48.65%

-22.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

4.61%

+1.80%

Volatility

OEPIX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison

Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund (OEPIX) has a higher volatility of 15.46% compared to NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) at 7.42%. This indicates that OEPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEPIXSRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.46%

7.42%

+8.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.99%

15.76%

+15.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.75%

19.52%

+27.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.72%

26.44%

+30.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.32%

38.30%

+24.02%

OEPIX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEPIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

OEPIX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison

OEPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SRV's 15.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OEPIX
Oil Equipment & Services UltraSector ProFund
0.54%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%2.56%2.36%0.05%0.00%
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
15.66%19.31%12.85%15.56%8.85%4.72%12.05%10.59%12.73%9.07%7.95%11.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


OEPIX and SRV have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OEPIX has higher volatility (15.46%) compared to SRV (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEPIX dropped -98.94% vs SRV's -92.97%.

OEPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEPIX and SRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer