PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEFA vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEFA vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEFA achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 43.93% return.


OEFA

1D
0.30%
1M
1.18%
YTD
2.69%
6M
2.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBO

1D
-4.15%
1M
-21.96%
YTD
43.93%
6M
41.96%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
8.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEFA vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OEFA and DBO is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEFA vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEFA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEFA vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OEFADBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

OEFA vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OEFA vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEFA drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEFA and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEFADBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-90.18%

+76.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-62.12%

+58.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-62.22%

+58.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.63%

Volatility

OEFA vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEFADBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

34.63%

-16.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

32.59%

-14.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

31.84%

-14.19%

OEFA vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEFA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

OEFA vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

OEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DBO's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.44%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
OEFA
ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF
1.45%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OEFA and DBO have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OEFA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OEFA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.45% for OEFA.

OEFA is categorized as International Equity, while DBO is Oil & Gas. OEFA tracks O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OEFA and 0.78% for DBO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEFA and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer