OEFA vs. BESF
OEFA (ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OEFA is a International Equity fund tracking the O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. OEFA is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. OEFA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.
Performance
OEFA vs. BESF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEFA achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 13.94% return.
OEFA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESF
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -8.03%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 55.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OEFA vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 2.69% | 0.73% |
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 13.94% | 22.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEFA and BESF is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEFA vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank
OEFA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BESF
OEFA vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OEFA | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OEFA vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEFA drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEFA and BESF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEFA | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -10.97% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -10.44% | +6.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -2.77% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility
OEFA vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEFA | BESF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 24.70% | -7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 24.43% | -6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 24.43% | -6.78% |
OEFA vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEFA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEFA vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison
OEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than BESF's 5.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BESF Bastion Energy ETF | 5.97% | 6.39% |
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 1.45% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEFA and BESF have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OEFA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OEFA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.
BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 1.45% for OEFA.
OEFA is categorized as International Equity, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OEFA and 0.80% for BESF.
Find the right allocation for OEFA and BESF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer