OEF vs. OILK
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OEF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OEF returned 15.70%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
OEF vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
OEF
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
OEF vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 9.51% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 32.71% | -21.03% | 29.18% | 21.21% | 31.87% | -4.16% | 21.82% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and OILK is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.17 |
The correlation between OEF and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OEF vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OEF
OILK
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
OEF
OILK
-
Communication Services
OEF
OILK
-
Financial Services
OEF
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
OEF
OILK
Healthcare
OEF
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
OEF
OILK
-
Industrials
OEF
OILK
-
Energy
OEF
OILK
-
Utilities
OEF
OILK
-
Basic Materials
OEF
OILK
-
Real Estate
OEF
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
OILK
OEF vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEF | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 2.06 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 2.59 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.42 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 6.91 | +4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEF | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.06 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.59 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.12 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
OEF vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -83.76% | +29.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -17.35% | +6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -23.42% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -34.69% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -3.66% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -32.61% | +20.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 8.56% | -5.94% |
Volatility
OEF vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) is 3.14%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that OEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 10.44% | -7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 23.26% | -13.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 28.75% | -16.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 30.12% | -12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 35.97% | -17.53% |
OEF vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEF vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.83% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEF and OILK have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to OEF (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 15.70% for OEF. On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 15.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.
OEF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.68% for OILK.
OEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OEF and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer