OEF vs. GECC
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Index, while GECC (Great Elm Capital Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, OEF returned 15.70%/yr vs -10.35%/yr for GECC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OEF vs. GECC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than GECC's -8.64% return.
OEF
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
GECC
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 9.95%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -13.22%
- 1Y
- -31.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- -10.35%
- 10Y*
- —
OEF vs. GECC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 9.51% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 32.71% | -21.03% | 29.18% | 21.21% | 31.87% | -4.16% | 21.82% |
GECC Great Elm Capital Corp. | -8.64% | -25.44% | 18.85% | 50.81% | -47.39% | -4.46% | -36.93% | 12.30% | -11.10% | -7.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and GECC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between OEF and GECC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (5 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. GECC — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
GECC
OEF vs. GECC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEF | GECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 0.87 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | -0.59 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | -0.96 | +12.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEF | GECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | -0.79 | +3.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | -0.34 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -0.29 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
OEF vs. GECC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, smaller than the maximum GECC drawdown of -74.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and GECC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | GECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -74.01% | +19.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -53.97% | +42.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -53.97% | +34.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -57.49% | +31.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -65.70% | +64.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -40.35% | +28.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 32.95% | -30.33% |
Volatility
OEF vs. GECC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) is 3.14%, while Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC) has a volatility of 19.85%. This indicates that OEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GECC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | GECC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 19.85% | -16.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 30.62% | -21.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 39.99% | -27.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 30.60% | -12.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 36.80% | -18.36% |
Dividends
OEF vs. GECC - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than GECC's 23.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GECC Great Elm Capital Corp. | 23.19% | 21.01% | 13.19% | 14.09% | 23.52% | 12.99% | 31.60% | 13.44% | 12.69% | 10.12% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.83% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEF and GECC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GECC has higher volatility (19.85%) compared to OEF (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs GECC's -74.01%.
OEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OEF and GECC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer