PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEF vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEF vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.


OEF

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.44%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.34%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
16.71%

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEF vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
9.51%19.80%30.74%32.71%-21.03%29.18%21.21%17.79%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between OEF and BBUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.98

The correlation between OEF and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

OEF vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OEF
BBUS

Technology

41.0%
37.1%

Communication Services

14.5%
10.8%

Financial Services

10.7%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.5%

Industrials

5.3%
7.2%

Energy

2.6%
3.2%

Utilities

0.9%
2.6%

Basic Materials

0.5%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.7%

Technology

OEF
41.0%
BBUS
37.1%

Communication Services

OEF
14.5%
BBUS
10.8%

Financial Services

OEF
10.7%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

OEF
10.5%
BBUS
9.4%

Healthcare

OEF
8.3%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

OEF
5.4%
BBUS
4.5%

Industrials

OEF
5.3%
BBUS
7.2%

Energy

OEF
2.6%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

OEF
0.9%
BBUS
2.6%

Basic Materials

OEF
0.5%
BBUS
1.2%

Real Estate

OEF
0.3%
BBUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEF vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEF vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OEFBBUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.33

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

3.18

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.00

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.29

13.76

-2.46

OEF vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEF and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OEFBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.33

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.79

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Drawdowns

OEF vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEFBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-35.35%

-18.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-9.21%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-19.01%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-25.46%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.74%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-5.46%

-6.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.00%

+0.62%

Volatility

OEF vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEFBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.88%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

8.96%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

11.87%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

17.03%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

19.59%

-1.15%

OEF vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OEF vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
0.83%0.81%1.03%1.19%1.55%1.06%1.43%1.87%2.09%1.81%2.07%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, OEF and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OEF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, OEF leads with 15.70% vs 13.43% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OEF has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 13.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for OEF.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.

OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.02% for BBUS.

OEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEF and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer