PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEF vs. ^W1DOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OEF vs. ^W1DOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly lower than ^W1DOW's 13.21% return. Over the past 10 years, OEF has outperformed ^W1DOW with an annualized return of 16.41%, while ^W1DOW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.38% annualized return.


OEF

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.05%
6M
12.43%
YTD
11.55%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
16.41%
ALL TIME*
8.56%

^W1DOW

1D
0.34%
1M
1.70%
6M
10.16%
YTD
13.21%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.38%
ALL TIME*
6.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$113.19M$97.47M$113.29M

OEF vs. ^W1DOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
11.55%19.80%30.74%32.71%-21.03%29.18%21.21%31.87%-4.16%21.82%
^W1DOW
Dow Jones Global Index
13.21%20.37%14.85%19.32%-19.78%16.15%14.05%23.71%-11.66%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between OEF and ^W1DOW is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2001

0.81

The correlation between OEF and ^W1DOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEF vs. ^W1DOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

^W1DOW
^W1DOW Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
^W1DOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OEF vs. ^W1DOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OEF^W1DOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.49

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.11

10.32

-2.21

OEF vs. ^W1DOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the ^W1DOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEF and ^W1DOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OEF vs. ^W1DOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, smaller than the maximum ^W1DOW drawdown of -59.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and ^W1DOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEF^W1DOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-59.23%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-9.51%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-16.12%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-27.87%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

-34.28%

+2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.70%

-11.57%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

2.29%

+0.62%

Volatility

OEF vs. ^W1DOW - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW) at 3.70%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^W1DOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEF^W1DOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

3.70%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

9.65%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

11.53%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

13.99%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

14.53%

+3.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


OEF and ^W1DOW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OEF has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to ^W1DOW (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs ^W1DOW's -59.23%.

^W1DOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEF and ^W1DOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer