PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^W1DOW vs. VZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^W1DOW vs. VZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^W1DOW vs. VZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^W1DOW
Dow Jones Global Index
-1.39%20.33%14.87%19.32%-19.86%16.24%14.08%23.71%-11.68%21.83%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
23.37%8.86%13.14%2.71%-20.02%-7.55%-0.13%13.83%11.26%3.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^W1DOW achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than VZ's 23.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ^W1DOW has outperformed VZ with an annualized return of 9.40%, while VZ has yielded a comparatively lower 4.47% annualized return.


^W1DOW

1D
1.89%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
1.10%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.40%

VZ

1D
-1.61%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
23.37%
6M
16.61%
1Y
16.28%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
4.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^W1DOW vs. VZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^W1DOW
^W1DOW Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
^W1DOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VZ
VZ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^W1DOW vs. VZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^W1DOWVZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

0.71

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

1.25

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.23

+1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

2.80

+10.26

^W1DOW vs. VZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^W1DOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the VZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^W1DOW and VZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^W1DOWVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

0.71

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.13

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.22

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.24

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between ^W1DOW and VZ is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

^W1DOW vs. VZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^W1DOW drawdown since its inception was -59.33%, which is greater than VZ's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^W1DOW and VZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^W1DOWVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.33%

-50.66%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-13.32%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

-40.31%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-41.21%

+6.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-3.87%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-14.80%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

5.83%

-3.83%

Volatility

^W1DOW vs. VZ - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) at 4.23%. This indicates that ^W1DOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^W1DOWVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

4.23%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

18.08%

-9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

22.95%

-9.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

21.32%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

20.25%

-6.69%