PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^W1DOW vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^W1DOW vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^W1DOW vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^W1DOW
Dow Jones Global Index
-1.39%20.33%14.87%19.32%-19.86%16.24%14.08%23.71%-11.68%21.83%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-5.76%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^W1DOW achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's -5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ^W1DOW has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 9.40%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.75% annualized return.


^W1DOW

1D
1.89%
1M
-5.16%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
1.10%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
15.21%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
9.40%

NVDA

1D
0.77%
1M
-3.68%
YTD
-5.76%
6M
-6.13%
1Y
59.59%
3Y*
85.01%
5Y*
66.40%
10Y*
69.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^W1DOW vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^W1DOW
^W1DOW Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
^W1DOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
^W1DOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^W1DOW vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^W1DOWNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

2.14

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.08

-0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.07

7.73

+5.34

^W1DOW vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^W1DOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^W1DOW and NVDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^W1DOWNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.29

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

1.40

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.61

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between ^W1DOW and NVDA is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

^W1DOW vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^W1DOW drawdown since its inception was -59.33%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^W1DOW and NVDA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^W1DOWNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.33%

-89.72%

+30.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-20.21%

+9.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.87%

-66.34%

+38.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-66.34%

+32.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-15.10%

+8.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-36.40%

+22.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

8.05%

-6.05%

Volatility

^W1DOW vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dow Jones Global Index (^W1DOW) is 4.69%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that ^W1DOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^W1DOWNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

10.43%

-5.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

25.79%

-17.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

41.42%

-27.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

51.72%

-38.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

49.84%

-36.28%