FOR vs. VIRC
FOR (Forestar Group Inc.) and VIRC (Virco Mfg. Corporation) are both stocks. FOR operates in Real Estate - Development (Real Estate), while VIRC operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FOR returned 9.31%/yr vs 4.43%/yr for VIRC. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FOR vs. VIRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOR achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than VIRC's -3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FOR has outperformed VIRC with an annualized return of 9.31%, while VIRC has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.
FOR
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 48.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
VIRC
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- -3.58%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- -21.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
FOR vs. VIRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOR Forestar Group Inc. | 17.82% | -4.98% | -21.62% | 114.60% | -29.15% | 7.78% | -3.21% | 50.54% | -37.05% | 65.41% |
VIRC Virco Mfg. Corporation | -3.58% | -36.87% | -14.16% | 166.63% | 50.17% | 18.97% | -40.33% | 6.00% | -19.68% | 17.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOR and VIRC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.10 |
Over the past year, FOR and VIRC have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FOR:
$1.48B
VIRC:
$96.12M
FOR:
$3.28
VIRC:
-$0.06
FOR:
0.87
VIRC:
0.49
FOR:
0.81
VIRC:
0.94
FOR:
$1.71B
VIRC:
$196.59M
FOR:
$284.30M
VIRC:
$77.91M
FOR:
$169.50M
VIRC:
$3.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOR vs. VIRC — Risk / Return Rank
FOR
VIRC
FOR vs. VIRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOR | VIRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.92 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | -0.58 | +2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | -0.96 | +5.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOR vs. VIRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOR drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, smaller than the maximum VIRC drawdown of -94.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOR and VIRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOR | VIRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.77% | -94.51% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.95% | -37.64% | +16.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.72% | -69.55% | +14.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.72% | -69.55% | +14.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.45% | -69.55% | +6.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.79% | -73.35% | +44.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.59% | -65.34% | +26.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.05% | 22.91% | -12.86% |
Volatility
FOR vs. VIRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) is 8.45%, while Virco Mfg. Corporation (VIRC) has a volatility of 14.44%. This indicates that FOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOR | VIRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 14.44% | -5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.12% | 24.90% | -0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.51% | 37.13% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.65% | 53.32% | -15.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.59% | 54.97% | -17.38% |
Dividends
FOR vs. VIRC - Dividend Comparison
FOR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VIRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOR Forestar Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIRC Virco Mfg. Corporation | 1.64% | 1.56% | 0.88% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 0.30% |
Financials
FOR vs. VIRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Forestar Group Inc. and Virco Mfg. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FOR vs. VIRC - Profitability Comparison
FOR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forestar Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 374.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VIRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virco Mfg. Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.70M and revenue of 30.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.
FOR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forestar Group Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 374.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
VIRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virco Mfg. Corporation reported an operating income of -3.66M and revenue of 30.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.9%.
FOR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Forestar Group Inc. reported a net income of 32.10M and revenue of 374.30M, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.
VIRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virco Mfg. Corporation reported a net income of -2.78M and revenue of 30.69M, resulting in a net margin of -9.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR and VIRC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIRC has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to FOR (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOR dropped -89.77% vs VIRC's -94.51%.
FOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOR and VIRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer