PortfoliosLab logo
FOR vs. SCCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FOR and SCCO is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FOR vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FOR:

-1.10

SCCO:

-0.49

Sortino Ratio

FOR:

-1.63

SCCO:

-0.56

Omega Ratio

FOR:

0.81

SCCO:

0.93

Calmar Ratio

FOR:

-0.78

SCCO:

-0.52

Martin Ratio

FOR:

-1.46

SCCO:

-1.22

Ulcer Index

FOR:

29.27%

SCCO:

16.79%

Daily Std Dev

FOR:

38.93%

SCCO:

38.74%

Max Drawdown

FOR:

-89.77%

SCCO:

-78.64%

Current Drawdown

FOR:

-53.01%

SCCO:

-25.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FOR:

$983.44M

SCCO:

$74.29B

EPS

FOR:

$3.29

SCCO:

$4.53

PE Ratio

FOR:

5.88

SCCO:

20.40

PEG Ratio

FOR:

3.50

SCCO:

1.20

PS Ratio

FOR:

0.67

SCCO:

6.21

PB Ratio

FOR:

0.60

SCCO:

7.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

FOR:

$1.47B

SCCO:

$11.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FOR:

$338.30M

SCCO:

$6.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

FOR:

$206.20M

SCCO:

$6.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOR achieves a -26.12% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FOR has underperformed SCCO with an annualized return of 3.60%, while SCCO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.73% annualized return.


FOR

YTD

-26.12%

1M

-0.57%

6M

-35.85%

1Y

-42.49%

3Y*

4.92%

5Y*

4.77%

10Y*

3.60%

SCCO

YTD

3.04%

1M

3.27%

6M

-6.43%

1Y

-18.96%

3Y*

19.32%

5Y*

26.24%

10Y*

15.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Forestar Group Inc.

Southern Copper Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FOR vs. SCCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FOR is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FOR is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FOR is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FOR is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FOR is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FOR is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCCO is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCCO is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCCO is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCCO is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCCO is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCCO is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FOR vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FOR Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the SCCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOR and SCCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FOR vs. SCCO - Dividend Comparison

FOR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FOR
Forestar Group Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
2.93%2.29%4.65%5.80%5.19%2.30%4.81%4.55%1.24%0.56%1.30%1.63%

Drawdowns

FOR vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOR drawdown since its inception was -89.77%, which is greater than SCCO's maximum drawdown of -78.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOR and SCCO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FOR vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison

Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) at 7.53%. This indicates that FOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FOR vs. SCCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Forestar Group Inc. and Southern Copper Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
351.00M
3.12B
(FOR) Total Revenue
(SCCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FOR vs. SCCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Forestar Group Inc. and Southern Copper Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
22.6%
50.2%
(FOR) Gross Margin
(SCCO) Gross Margin
FOR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Forestar Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 351.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.6%.

SCCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.57B and revenue of 3.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.

FOR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Forestar Group Inc. reported an operating income of 41.70M and revenue of 351.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

SCCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 1.54B and revenue of 3.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

FOR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Forestar Group Inc. reported a net income of 31.60M and revenue of 351.00M, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.

SCCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 945.90M and revenue of 3.12B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.