PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTZ vs. ZOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTZ vs. ZOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTZ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly higher than ZOCT's 2.64% return.


OCTZ

1D
-0.44%
1M
4.25%
YTD
8.27%
6M
8.27%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*

ZOCT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.94%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTZ vs. ZOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OCTZ and ZOCT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.85

The correlation between OCTZ and ZOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTZ vs. ZOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTZ
OCTZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
OCTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ZOCT
ZOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTZ vs. ZOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTZZOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.72

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

4.99

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.00

24.15

-12.14

OCTZ vs. ZOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the ZOCT Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTZ and ZOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTZZOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

3.29

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.91

-0.84

Drawdowns

OCTZ vs. ZOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTZ drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, which is greater than ZOCT's maximum drawdown of -3.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTZ and ZOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTZZOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-3.18%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-1.46%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.04%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-0.34%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.30%

+1.42%

Volatility

OCTZ vs. ZOCT - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) at 0.30%. This indicates that OCTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTZZOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

0.30%

+2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.26%

1.69%

+5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

2.22%

+7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

3.04%

+9.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.37%

3.04%

+9.33%

OCTZ vs. ZOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTZ and ZOCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

OCTZ vs. ZOCT - Dividend Comparison

OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, while ZOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
OCTZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF
3.69%3.99%1.26%3.28%0.67%
ZOCT
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OCTZ and ZOCT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OCTZ has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to ZOCT (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTZ dropped -15.82% vs ZOCT's -3.18%.

On 1-year performance, OCTZ leads with 20.60% vs 7.26% for ZOCT. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ZOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OCTZ has performed better with a 20.60% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OCTZ and ZOCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

OCTZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.00% for ZOCT.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.

ZOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTZ and ZOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer