PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTW vs. ARLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OCTW vs. ARLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OCTW vs. ARLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OCTW
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF
-1.36%9.68%5.06%
ARLU
Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF
-5.35%11.27%9.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTW achieves a -1.36% return, which is significantly higher than ARLU's -5.35% return.


OCTW

1D
1.37%
1M
-2.01%
YTD
-1.36%
6M
0.36%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*

ARLU

1D
2.91%
1M
-5.47%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.66%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OCTW vs. ARLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTW and ARLU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Return for Risk

OCTW vs. ARLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTW
OCTW Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
OCTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTW Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTW Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ARLU
ARLU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ARLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARLU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ARLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARLU Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTW vs. ARLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) and Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTWARLUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

0.80

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

1.21

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.23

+0.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.02

5.35

+3.67

OCTW vs. ARLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTW Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the ARLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTW and ARLU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTWARLUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.80

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.56

+0.77

Correlation

The correlation between OCTW and ARLU is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OCTW vs. ARLU - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTW nor ARLU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

OCTW vs. ARLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTW drawdown since its inception was -8.38%, smaller than the maximum ARLU drawdown of -15.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTW and ARLU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTWARLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-15.38%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.86%

-9.66%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-7.04%

+4.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-2.30%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

2.21%

-1.12%

Volatility

OCTW vs. ARLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) is 2.42%, while Allianzim U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Apr ETF (ARLU) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that OCTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OCTWARLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

5.40%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.07%

9.38%

-5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

13.99%

-5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

12.79%

-6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.19%

12.79%

-6.60%