PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTT vs. LAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OCTT vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OCTT vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OCTT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF
-2.74%13.86%6.53%
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
0.84%5.81%4.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTT achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than LAPR's 0.84% return.


OCTT

1D
1.95%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
13.71%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*

LAPR

1D
0.05%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.84%
6M
2.11%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OCTT vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than LAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OCTT vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTT
OCTT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
OCTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

LAPR
LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTT vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTTLAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.28

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

1.92

-0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.55

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.48

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.45

10.62

-2.17

OCTT vs. LAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the LAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTT and LAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTTLAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.28

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

1.71

-0.73

Correlation

The correlation between OCTT and LAPR is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

OCTT vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison

OCTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LAPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%.


Drawdowns

OCTT vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTT drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTT and LAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTTLAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-3.81%

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-3.81%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

0.00%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-0.12%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

0.53%

+1.14%

Volatility

OCTT vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.10%. This indicates that OCTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OCTTLAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

0.10%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

0.68%

+5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

4.40%

+8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

3.39%

+6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.30%

3.39%

+6.91%