OCTT vs. NVBT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OCTT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF) and NVBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OCTT returned 13.29%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for NVBT. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.

Performance

OCTT vs. NVBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OCTT having a 6.08% return and NVBT slightly higher at 6.30%.

OCTT

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 5.68%
• 1Y: 17.56%
• 3Y*: 13.29%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

NVBT

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: 6.30%
• 6M: 5.72%
• 1Y: 16.41%
• 3Y*: 11.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTT vs. NVBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
OCTT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF	6.08%	13.86%	11.87%	20.92%	0.72%
NVBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF	6.30%	12.84%	12.03%	16.28%	-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTT and NVBT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022	0.96

The correlation between OCTT and NVBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OCTT vs. NVBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTT

OCTT Risk / Return Rank: 77
OCTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
OCTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
OCTT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
OCTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
OCTT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

NVBT

NVBT Risk / Return Rank: 69
NVBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
NVBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
NVBT Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
NVBT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTT vs. NVBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OCTT	NVBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.03	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.90	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.39	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	2.66	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.84	12.90	+1.94

OCTT vs. NVBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the NVBT Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTT and NVBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OCTT vs. NVBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTT drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, roughly equal to the maximum NVBT drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTT and NVBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTT	NVBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.49%	-12.90%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-6.21%	+0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.04%	-12.90%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-1.46%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-1.35%	-0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.19%	1.27%	-0.08%

Volatility

OCTT vs. NVBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Oct ETF (OCTT) is 2.38%, while Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that OCTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTT	NVBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.38%	2.89%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.20%	6.76%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.93%	8.13%	-0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	10.36%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.21%	10.36%	-0.15%

OCTT vs. NVBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTT and NVBT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

Dividends

OCTT vs. NVBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTT nor NVBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTT and NVBT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, OCTT and NVBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OCTT or NVBT?

NVBT has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to OCTT (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTT dropped -13.49% vs NVBT's -12.90%.

Which ETF is better, OCTT or NVBT?

On 3-year performance, OCTT leads with 13.29% vs 11.90% for NVBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, OCTT has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTT or NVBT?

Over the 3-year period, OCTT has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTT or NVBT?

OCTT and NVBT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTT or NVBT?

OCTT and NVBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.