OCTM vs. RDVY

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

OCTM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OCTM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. OCTM is actively managed, while RDVY is passively managed. Over the past year, OCTM returned 7.11% vs 30.74% for RDVY. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OCTM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.

Performance

OCTM vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October (OCTM) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTM achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return.

OCTM

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 3.11%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.16%

RDVY

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 12.71%
• YTD: 17.25%
• 1Y: 30.74%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 16.25%
• ALL TIME*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OCTM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October	$97.95K	$54.01K	$56.44K
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	$77.65M	$79.19M	$83.63M

OCTM vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OCTM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October	3.53%	7.03%	0.33%
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	17.25%	18.90%	-1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTM and RDVY is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2024	0.75

The correlation between OCTM and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OCTM vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OCTM

OCTM Risk / Return Rank: 95
OCTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
OCTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
OCTM Omega Ratio Rank: 96
OCTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
OCTM Martin Ratio Rank: 95

RDVY

RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 85
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OCTM vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October (OCTM) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OCTM	RDVY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.83	2.00	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.34	2.87	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.35	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	3.25	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.31	13.63	+6.68

OCTM vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTM Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTM and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OCTM vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTM drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTM and RDVY.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTM	RDVY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.29%	-40.60%	+37.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.64%	-9.04%	+7.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.11%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-4.95%	+4.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.33%	2.15%	-1.82%

Volatility

OCTM vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October (OCTM) is 0.55%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that OCTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTM	RDVY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.55%	3.53%	-2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.85%	11.46%	-9.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40%	14.65%	-12.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.02%	18.92%	-15.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.02%	21.03%	-18.01%

OCTM vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

OCTM vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

OCTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OCTM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	0.83%	1.11%	1.64%	2.09%	2.21%	1.04%	1.53%	1.55%	1.68%	1.25%	2.07%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTM and RDVY in my portfolio?

OCTM and RDVY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OCTM or RDVY?

RDVY has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to OCTM (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTM dropped -3.29% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

Which ETF is better, OCTM or RDVY?

On 1-year performance, RDVY leads with 30.74% vs 7.11% for OCTM. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, OCTM has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTM or RDVY?

Over the 1-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 30.74% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTM or RDVY?

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OCTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTM or RDVY?

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for OCTM.

What is the main difference between OCTM and RDVY?

OCTM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RDVY is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for OCTM and 0.47% for RDVY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.