OCTH vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OCTH (Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OCTH is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. OCTH is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, OCTH returned 7.08% vs 38.14% for FFTY. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OCTH charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

OCTH vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTH achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.11% return.

OCTH

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 2.88%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 7.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 7.67%
• YTD: 20.11%
• 6M: 21.02%
• 1Y: 38.14%
• 3Y*: 21.57%
• 5Y*: -0.60%
• 10Y*: 7.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTH vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OCTH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October	2.88%	6.58%	6.24%	3.79%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	20.11%	23.38%	18.36%	10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between OCTH and FFTY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.53

The correlation between OCTH and FFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

OCTH vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OCTH	FFTY
Technology	33.6%	24.8%
Financial Services	12.4%	13.1%
Communication Services	10.5%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	4.8%
Healthcare	9.5%	12.1%
Industrials	8.5%	26.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	-
Energy	4.0%	8.0%
Utilities	2.5%	2.1%
Real Estate	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	21.6%

Return for Risk

OCTH vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTH

OCTH Risk / Return Rank: 67
OCTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
OCTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
OCTH Omega Ratio Rank: 71
OCTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
OCTH Martin Ratio Rank: 80

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 30
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTH vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OCTH	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.12	+0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	1.55	+1.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.20	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	1.65	+1.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.44	4.36	+11.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OCTH vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTH and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OCTH	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	1.12	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.23	0.20	+1.03

Drawdowns

OCTH vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTH drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTH and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCTH	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.71%	-59.46%	+51.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.28%	-23.29%	+21.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-15.34%	+15.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.27%	-22.38%	+22.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	8.77%	-8.31%

Volatility

OCTH vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October (OCTH) is 0.38%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 9.42%. This indicates that OCTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCTH	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.38%	9.42%	-9.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.88%	26.18%	-23.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.72%	34.09%	-30.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.06%	29.14%	-23.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.06%	27.41%	-21.35%

OCTH vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

OCTH vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

OCTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than FFTY's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.12%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%
OCTH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October	6.31%	6.33%	7.43%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCTH and FFTY in my portfolio?

OCTH and FFTY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OCTH or FFTY?

FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to OCTH (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTH dropped -7.71% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

Which ETF is better, OCTH or FFTY?

On 1-year performance, FFTY leads with 38.14% vs 7.08% for OCTH. On fees, OCTH is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, OCTH has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OCTH or FFTY?

Over the 1-year period, FFTY has performed better with a 38.14% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OCTH or FFTY?

OCTH is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OCTH or FFTY?

OCTH has the higher dividend yield at 6.31%, compared with 1.12% for FFTY.

What is the main difference between OCTH and FFTY?

OCTH is categorized as Options Trading, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTH and 0.80% for FFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.