PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTB vs. ZFEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTB vs. ZFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTB achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than ZFEB's 2.19% return.


OCTB

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.52%
6M
5.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZFEB

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.00%
YTD
2.19%
6M
2.25%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTB vs. ZFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OCTB and ZFEB is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.85

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTB vs. ZFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ZFEB
ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTB vs. ZFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OCTBZFEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.07

OCTB vs. ZFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OCTB vs. ZFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTB drawdown since its inception was -4.79%, which is greater than ZFEB's maximum drawdown of -3.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTB and ZFEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTBZFEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-3.00%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.23%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-0.36%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

Volatility

OCTB vs. ZFEB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTBZFEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.26%

2.18%

+5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.26%

2.86%

+4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.26%

2.86%

+4.40%

OCTB vs. ZFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ZFEB's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTB vs. ZFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither OCTB nor ZFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


OCTB and ZFEB have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZFEB.

OCTB and ZFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OCTB and 0.79% for ZFEB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTB and ZFEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer