PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTB vs. CBXO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCTB vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTB achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly higher than CBXO's -3.67% return.


OCTB

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.41%
YTD
6.18%
6M
6.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBXO

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-3.67%
6M
-5.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCTB vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OCTB and CBXO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCTB vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OCTB vs. CBXO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTBCBXODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

-2.36

+4.33

Drawdowns

OCTB vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTB drawdown since its inception was -4.79%, smaller than the maximum CBXO drawdown of -11.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTB and CBXO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTBCBXODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-11.40%

+6.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-11.40%

+11.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-8.46%

+7.76%

Volatility

OCTB vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCTBCBXODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.20%

7.23%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.20%

7.23%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.20%

7.23%

-0.03%

OCTB vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCTB vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison

OCTB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OCTB and CBXO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.

CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for OCTB.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OCTB and 0.69% for CBXO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCTB and CBXO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer