PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCMAX vs. GGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCMAX vs. GGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) and GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCMAX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than GGN's -2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, OCMAX has outperformed GGN with an annualized return of 16.61%, while GGN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.21% annualized return.


OCMAX

1D
-1.56%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
0.32%
6M
-3.21%
1Y
61.06%
3Y*
51.76%
5Y*
21.66%
10Y*
16.61%

GGN

1D
-2.02%
1M
-5.25%
YTD
-2.80%
6M
-5.19%
1Y
16.41%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCMAX vs. GGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OCMAX
OCM Gold Atlas
0.32%168.37%23.87%4.82%-17.28%-9.16%45.45%58.42%-13.25%10.55%
GGN
GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust
-2.80%48.19%9.59%15.01%6.80%17.41%-8.62%36.59%-19.53%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between OCMAX and GGN is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010

0.60

The correlation between OCMAX and GGN shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (10 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCMAX vs. GGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCMAX
OCMAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OCMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
OCMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

GGN
GGN Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
GGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
GGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGN Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCMAX vs. GGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) and GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OCMAXGGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.14

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.98

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

2.71

+2.98

OCMAX vs. GGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the GGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCMAX and GGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OCMAX vs. GGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCMAX drawdown since its inception was -76.26%, roughly equal to the maximum GGN drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCMAX and GGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCMAXGGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.26%

-73.04%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.28%

-16.80%

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.28%

-16.80%

-14.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.05%

-22.08%

-21.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.14%

-53.04%

+7.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.58%

-15.19%

-8.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.10%

-31.74%

-4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.02%

6.07%

+4.95%

Volatility

OCMAX vs. GGN - Volatility Comparison

OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) has a higher volatility of 16.55% compared to GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust (GGN) at 7.17%. This indicates that OCMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCMAXGGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.55%

7.17%

+9.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.50%

19.58%

+14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.89%

23.69%

+17.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.77%

19.20%

+15.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

23.10%

+10.87%

OCMAX vs. GGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCMAX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than GGN's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCMAX vs. GGN - Dividend Comparison

OCMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, less than GGN's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGN
GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources and Income Trust
7.42%6.98%9.55%10.37%9.92%9.60%13.68%13.64%16.22%11.52%15.85%17.68%
OCMAX
OCM Gold Atlas
5.90%5.91%2.97%0.00%0.04%0.95%1.44%5.66%24.55%6.72%18.48%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


OCMAX and GGN have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OCMAX has higher volatility (16.55%) compared to GGN (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCMAX dropped -76.26% vs GGN's -73.04%.

OCMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCMAX and GGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer