OBTC vs. GFOF
OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) and GFOF (Grayscale Future of Finance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitcoin (BTC), while GFOF is a Blockchain fund tracking the Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OBTC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for GFOF.
Performance
OBTC vs. GFOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OBTC
- 1D
- -5.16%
- 1M
- -26.03%
- YTD
- -31.16%
- 6M
- -29.55%
- 1Y
- -32.02%
- 3Y*
- 55.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
GFOF
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC vs. GFOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -31.16% | -1.87% | 130.89% | 277.81% | -67.39% |
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 60.08% | 145.49% | -68.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBTC and GFOF is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBTC vs. GFOF — Risk / Return Rank
OBTC
GFOF
OBTC vs. GFOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and Grayscale Future of Finance ETF (GFOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBTC | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBTC | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | — | — |
Drawdowns
OBTC vs. GFOF - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBTC | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.62% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.62% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.40% | — | — |
Volatility
OBTC vs. GFOF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBTC | GFOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.58% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.14% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.55% | — | — |
OBTC vs. GFOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GFOF's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBTC vs. GFOF - Dividend Comparison
Neither OBTC nor GFOF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GFOF Grayscale Future of Finance ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.55% | 4.08% |
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBTC and GFOF have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OBTC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OBTC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GFOF.
OBTC and GFOF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
OBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GFOF is Blockchain. OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC), while GFOF tracks Bloomberg Grayscale Future of Finance Index. They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.70% for GFOF.
Find the right allocation for OBTC and GFOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer