OBTC vs. EZPZ
OBTC (Osprey Bitcoin Trust) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - OBTC tracks the Bitcoin (BTC) while EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OBTC returned -32.02% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OBTC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
OBTC vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -31.16% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -34.43% return.
OBTC
- 1D
- -5.16%
- 1M
- -26.03%
- YTD
- -31.16%
- 6M
- -29.55%
- 1Y
- -32.02%
- 3Y*
- 55.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBTC vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OBTC Osprey Bitcoin Trust | -31.16% | -4.43% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -10.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBTC and EZPZ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.92 |
The correlation between OBTC and EZPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBTC vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
OBTC
EZPZ
OBTC vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBTC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.86 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.76 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | -1.37 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBTC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | -0.90 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | -0.71 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
OBTC vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBTC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -55.78% | -38.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.14% | -55.78% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.62% | -55.78% | -9.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.62% | -21.92% | -47.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.40% | 30.82% | -5.42% |
Volatility
OBTC vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) is 9.93%, while Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that OBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBTC | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.93% | 10.69% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.48% | 36.53% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.58% | 47.23% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.14% | 47.86% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.55% | 47.86% | +23.69% |
OBTC vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBTC vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither OBTC nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, OBTC and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZPZ has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to OBTC (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBTC dropped -94.50% vs EZPZ's -55.78%.
On 1-year performance, OBTC leads with -32.02% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OBTC has performed better with a -32.02% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for OBTC.
OBTC and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC), while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.19% for EZPZ.
OBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.72 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBTC and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer