PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBTC vs. EZPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBTC vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBTC achieves a -31.16% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -34.43% return.


OBTC

1D
-5.16%
1M
-26.03%
YTD
-31.16%
6M
-29.55%
1Y
-32.02%
3Y*
55.06%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*

EZPZ

1D
-6.18%
1M
-26.82%
YTD
-34.43%
6M
-36.79%
1Y
-42.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBTC vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OBTC
Osprey Bitcoin Trust
-31.16%-4.43%
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
-34.43%-10.23%

Correlation

The correlation between OBTC and EZPZ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.92

The correlation between OBTC and EZPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBTC vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBTC
OBTC Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
OBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

EZPZ
EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBTC vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OBTCEZPZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.86

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

-0.76

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

-1.37

+0.11

OBTC vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is comparable to the EZPZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBTC and EZPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OBTCEZPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

-0.90

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

-0.71

+0.48

Drawdowns

OBTC vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBTC drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBTC and EZPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBTCEZPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.50%

-55.78%

-38.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.14%

-55.78%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.62%

-55.78%

-9.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.62%

-21.92%

-47.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.40%

30.82%

-5.42%

Volatility

OBTC vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Osprey Bitcoin Trust (OBTC) is 9.93%, while Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that OBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBTCEZPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.93%

10.69%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.48%

36.53%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.58%

47.23%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.14%

47.86%

+10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.55%

47.86%

+23.69%

OBTC vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBTC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBTC vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither OBTC nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, OBTC and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZPZ has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to OBTC (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBTC dropped -94.50% vs EZPZ's -55.78%.

On 1-year performance, OBTC leads with -32.02% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, OBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OBTC has performed better with a -32.02% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for OBTC.

OBTC and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

OBTC tracks Bitcoin (BTC), while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price. They also come from different issuers: Osprey Funds and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OBTC and 0.19% for EZPZ.

OBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.72 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBTC and EZPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer