OBOR vs. QEMM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

OBOR (KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF) and QEMM (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - OBOR tracks the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure while QEMM tracks the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OBOR returned 1.31%/yr vs 7.83%/yr for QEMM. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OBOR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QEMM.

Performance

OBOR vs. QEMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBOR achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than QEMM's 25.92% return.

OBOR

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 7.97%
• 1Y: 24.36%
• 3Y*: 12.00%
• 5Y*: 1.31%
• 10Y*: —

QEMM

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 7.71%
• YTD: 25.92%
• 6M: 27.45%
• 1Y: 44.42%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 7.83%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBOR vs. QEMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF	4.26%	27.86%	8.55%	-7.91%	-21.96%	17.06%	13.47%	16.75%	-15.36%	1.74%
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	25.92%	21.92%	4.98%	12.50%	-17.82%	6.34%	9.95%	15.40%	-13.33%	6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between OBOR and QEMM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between OBOR and QEMM has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OBOR vs. QEMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OBOR	QEMM
Basic Materials	26.6%	5.6%
Industrials	25.1%	7.2%
Financial Services	23.1%	19.6%
Utilities	14.1%	3.0%
Energy	8.5%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	0.4%	8.3%
Healthcare	0.2%	3.5%
Communication Services	0.2%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.1%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Technology	-	33.8%

Return for Risk

OBOR vs. QEMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBOR

OBOR Risk / Return Rank: 42
OBOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
OBOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
OBOR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
OBOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
OBOR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

QEMM

QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 81
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBOR vs. QEMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OBOR	QEMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.68	-1.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	3.57	-1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.50	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	4.33	-2.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.96	15.87	-9.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OBOR vs. QEMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the QEMM Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBOR and QEMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OBOR	QEMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.68	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.52	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.35	-0.14

Drawdowns

OBOR vs. QEMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than QEMM's maximum drawdown of -36.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and QEMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	OBOR	QEMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.54%	-36.89%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-10.40%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-17.03%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.00%	-27.49%	-6.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	0.00%	-8.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.98%	-10.64%	-5.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	2.84%	+1.24%

Volatility

OBOR vs. QEMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) is 6.43%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that OBOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QEMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OBOR	QEMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	7.14%	-0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.80%	14.71%	-0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	16.64%	-0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	15.23%	+0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.52%	16.89%	+1.63%

OBOR vs. QEMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QEMM's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

OBOR vs. QEMM - Dividend Comparison

OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than QEMM's 4.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF	1.86%	1.94%	3.87%	3.40%	4.75%	3.26%	2.04%	4.33%	0.02%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.29%	4.90%	5.17%	4.88%	4.07%	2.35%	2.48%	3.05%	2.86%	2.11%	2.03%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OBOR and QEMM in my portfolio?

OBOR and QEMM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OBOR or QEMM?

QEMM has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to OBOR (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBOR dropped -41.54% vs QEMM's -36.89%.

Which ETF is better, OBOR or QEMM?

On 5-year performance, QEMM leads with 7.83% vs 1.31% for OBOR. On fees, QEMM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, OBOR has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OBOR or QEMM?

Over the 5-year period, QEMM has performed better with a 7.83% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OBOR or QEMM?

QEMM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OBOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OBOR or QEMM?

QEMM has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 1.86% for OBOR.

What is the main difference between OBOR and QEMM?

OBOR tracks MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: CICC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OBOR and 0.30% for QEMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QEMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.