OBOR vs. KVLE
OBOR (KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF) and KVLE (KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OBOR is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while KVLE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OBOR returned 0.71%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for KVLE. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OBOR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for KVLE.
Performance
OBOR vs. KVLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBOR achieves a -0.31% return, which is significantly lower than KVLE's 9.27% return.
OBOR
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
KVLE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- —
OBOR vs. KVLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | -0.31% | 27.86% | 8.55% | -7.91% | -21.96% | 17.06% | 9.14% |
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 9.27% | 9.34% | 18.25% | 10.49% | -5.96% | 28.01% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBOR and KVLE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.41 |
OBOR vs. KVLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OBOR
KVLE
Basic Materials
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
OBOR
KVLE
Industrials
OBOR
KVLE
Financial Services
OBOR
KVLE
Utilities
OBOR
KVLE
Energy
OBOR
KVLE
Consumer Cyclical
OBOR
KVLE
Healthcare
OBOR
KVLE
Communication Services
OBOR
KVLE
Consumer Defensive
OBOR
-
KVLE
Real Estate
OBOR
-
KVLE
Technology
OBOR
-
KVLE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBOR vs. KVLE — Risk / Return Rank
OBOR
KVLE
OBOR vs. KVLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OBOR | KVLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.85 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 7.07 | -3.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OBOR vs. KVLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than KVLE's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and KVLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBOR | KVLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.54% | -18.38% | -23.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -9.59% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.06% | -16.39% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.00% | -18.38% | -15.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.04% | -1.76% | -10.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -3.19% | -12.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | 2.51% | +2.31% |
Volatility
OBOR vs. KVLE - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) has a higher volatility of 7.01% compared to KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) at 3.68%. This indicates that OBOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KVLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBOR | KVLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.01% | 3.68% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 8.73% | +6.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.82% | 11.25% | +5.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 14.53% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 14.33% | +4.22% |
OBOR vs. KVLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than KVLE's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBOR vs. KVLE - Dividend Comparison
OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than KVLE's 7.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 7.37% | 7.90% | 7.99% | 2.53% | 5.78% | 9.51% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF | 1.95% | 1.94% | 3.87% | 3.40% | 4.75% | 3.26% | 2.04% | 4.33% | 0.02% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBOR and KVLE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OBOR has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to KVLE (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBOR dropped -41.54% vs KVLE's -18.38%.
On 5-year performance, KVLE leads with 10.02% vs 0.71% for OBOR. On fees, KVLE is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, KVLE has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KVLE has performed better with a 10.02% return vs 0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KVLE is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OBOR.
KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 1.95% for OBOR.
OBOR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while KVLE is Large Cap Value Equities. OBOR tracks MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OBOR and 0.56% for KVLE.
KVLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBOR and KVLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer