OBOR vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OBOR (KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OBOR is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global China Infrastructure Exposure, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. OBOR is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. OBOR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

OBOR vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

OBOR

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: -0.31%
• 6M: -1.03%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: 0.71%
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBOR vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF	-2.45%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between OBOR and BPH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.02

OBOR vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OBOR	BPH
Basic Materials	26.6%	-
Industrials	25.1%	-
Financial Services	23.1%	-
Utilities	14.1%	-
Energy	8.5%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.4%	-
Healthcare	0.2%	-
Communication Services	0.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

OBOR vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBOR

OBOR Risk / Return Rank: 27
OBOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
OBOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
OBOR Omega Ratio Rank: 28
OBOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
OBOR Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBOR vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF (OBOR) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OBOR	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.37	—	—

Drawdowns

OBOR vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBOR drawdown since its inception was -41.54%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBOR and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	OBOR	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.54%	-9.43%	-32.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.04%	-8.71%	-3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.94%	-3.18%	-12.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OBOR	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.82%	24.10%	-7.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	24.10%	-7.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.55%	24.10%	-5.55%

OBOR vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBOR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

OBOR vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

OBOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than BPH's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OBOR KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF	1.95%	1.94%	3.87%	3.40%	4.75%	3.26%	2.04%	4.33%	0.02%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OBOR and BPH in my portfolio?

OBOR and BPH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OBOR or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OBOR or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OBOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OBOR or BPH?

OBOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.53% for BPH.

What is the main difference between OBOR and BPH?

OBOR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OBOR and 0.19% for BPH.