OBND vs. XLE
OBND (SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OBND is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. OBND is actively managed, while XLE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OBND returned 6.89%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for XLE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OBND charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
OBND vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBND achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return.
OBND
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- 6.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
OBND vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBND SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF | 1.31% | 7.85% | 4.80% | 9.47% | -11.24% | 0.02% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 6.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBND and XLE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021 | 0.07 |
The correlation between OBND and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OBND vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OBND
XLE
Financial Services
-
Energy
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
OBND
XLE
-
Energy
OBND
XLE
Technology
OBND
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
OBND
XLE
-
Healthcare
OBND
XLE
-
Communication Services
OBND
XLE
-
Real Estate
OBND
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
OBND
XLE
-
Basic Materials
OBND
-
XLE
-
Industrials
OBND
-
XLE
-
Utilities
OBND
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBND vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
OBND
XLE
OBND vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBND | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 2.21 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.95 | 2.84 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 3.75 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 10.92 | -0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBND | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.21 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.31 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
OBND vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBND drawdown since its inception was -15.86%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBND and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBND | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.86% | -71.26% | +55.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -12.05% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.17% | -20.14% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -6.15% | +5.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -17.98% | +13.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 4.14% | -3.48% |
Volatility
OBND vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND) is 1.08%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that OBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBND | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 8.25% | -7.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 16.58% | -13.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.38% | 20.53% | -17.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 26.02% | -21.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 29.59% | -24.93% |
OBND vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBND has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBND vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
OBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBND SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF | 6.28% | 6.26% | 6.53% | 6.01% | 4.56% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBND and XLE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to OBND (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBND dropped -15.86% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 3-year performance, XLE leads with 17.46% vs 6.89% for OBND. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, OBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XLE has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for OBND.
OBND has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.
OBND is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for OBND and 0.08% for XLE.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBND and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer