OBND vs. DABS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OBND (SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF) and DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OBND returned 6.61% vs 5.66% for DABS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OBND charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DABS.

Performance

OBND vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBND achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than DABS's 0.88% return.

OBND

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.31%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 6.61%
• 3Y*: 6.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DABS

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 5.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBND vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OBND SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF	1.31%	5.40%
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	0.88%	5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between OBND and DABS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025	0.58

The correlation between OBND and DABS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OBND vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBND

OBND Risk / Return Rank: 58
OBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
OBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
OBND Omega Ratio Rank: 62
OBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
OBND Martin Ratio Rank: 58

DABS

DABS Risk / Return Rank: 78
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBND vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OBND	DABS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.28	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.95	3.52	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.47	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	4.40	-2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.09	15.21	-5.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OBND vs. DABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the DABS Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBND and DABS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OBND	DABS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	2.28	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	2.05	-1.55

Drawdowns

OBND vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBND drawdown since its inception was -15.86%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBND and DABS.

Drawdown Indicators

	OBND	DABS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.86%	-1.47%	-14.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-1.29%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.49%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-0.31%	-4.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	0.37%	+0.29%

Volatility

OBND vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF (OBND) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) at 0.71%. This indicates that OBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OBND	DABS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	0.71%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.68%	1.60%	+1.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.38%	2.49%	+0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.66%	2.56%	+2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.66%	2.56%	+2.10%

OBND vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBND has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

OBND vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

OBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than DABS's 4.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.89%	3.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OBND SPDR Loomis Sayles Opportunistic Bond ETF	6.28%	6.26%	6.53%	6.01%	4.56%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OBND and DABS in my portfolio?

OBND and DABS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OBND or DABS?

OBND has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to DABS (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBND dropped -15.86% vs DABS's -1.47%.

Which ETF is better, OBND or DABS?

On 1-year performance, OBND leads with 6.61% vs 5.66% for DABS. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OBND or DABS?

Over the 1-year period, OBND has performed better with a 6.61% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OBND or DABS?

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for OBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OBND or DABS?

OBND has the higher dividend yield at 6.28%, compared with 4.89% for DABS.

What is the main difference between OBND and DABS?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for OBND and 0.40% for DABS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.