PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBIL vs. IVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBIL vs. IVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBIL achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 13.51% return.


OBIL

1D
0.04%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.41%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
10Y*

IVES

1D
-0.75%
1M
-5.68%
YTD
13.51%
6M
10.84%
1Y
33.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBIL vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OBIL
US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF
1.31%2.63%
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
13.51%25.11%

Correlation

The correlation between OBIL and IVES is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBIL vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBIL
OBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
OBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
OBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IVES
IVES Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVES Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVES Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBIL vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OBILIVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+10.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.25

1.22

+2.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

24.17

1.49

+22.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

123.45

4.03

+119.42

OBIL vs. IVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBIL Sharpe Ratio is 6.35, which is higher than the IVES Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBIL and IVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OBIL vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.33%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBIL and IVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBILIVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-22.64%

+22.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.15%

-22.64%

+22.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-14.02%

+14.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-5.89%

+5.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

8.37%

-8.34%

Volatility

OBIL vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) is 0.21%, while Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that OBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBILIVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

11.58%

-11.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.38%

21.22%

-20.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57%

27.05%

-26.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

26.62%

-25.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.82%

26.62%

-25.80%

OBIL vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBIL vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison

OBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than IVES's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
0.37%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OBIL
US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF
3.64%3.83%4.56%4.92%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBIL and IVES have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVES has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to OBIL (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBIL dropped -0.33% vs IVES's -22.64%.

On 1-year performance, IVES leads with 33.63% vs 3.60% for OBIL. On fees, OBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, OBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVES has performed better with a 33.63% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

OBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 0.37% for IVES.

OBIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while IVES is Technology Equities. OBIL tracks ICE BofA US 1-Year Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for OBIL and 0.75% for IVES.

OBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.35 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBIL and IVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer