OBIL vs. IVES
OBIL (US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF) and IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US 1-Year Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVES is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. OBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVES.
Performance
OBIL vs. IVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBIL achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than IVES's 27.14% return.
OBIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVES
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- 18.28%
- YTD
- 27.14%
- 6M
- 24.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBIL vs. IVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OBIL US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF | 1.17% | 2.57% |
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 27.14% | 25.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBIL and IVES is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBIL vs. IVES — Risk / Return Rank
OBIL
IVES
OBIL vs. IVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBIL | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.07 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 16.19 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.70 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 27.56 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 150.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBIL | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.38 | 2.32 | +3.06 |
Drawdowns
OBIL vs. IVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.33%, smaller than the maximum IVES drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBIL and IVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBIL | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -22.64% | +22.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.69% | +3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -5.63% | +5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | — | — |
Volatility
OBIL vs. IVES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBIL | IVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54% | 25.77% | -25.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 25.77% | -24.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.82% | 25.77% | -24.95% |
OBIL vs. IVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IVES's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBIL vs. IVES - Dividend Comparison
OBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than IVES's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 0.33% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OBIL US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF | 3.65% | 3.83% | 4.56% | 4.92% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBIL and IVES have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.
OBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.33% for IVES.
OBIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while IVES is Technology Equities. OBIL tracks ICE BofA US 1-Year Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for OBIL and 0.75% for IVES.
Find the right allocation for OBIL and IVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer