PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBEGX vs. CSUAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBEGX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oberweis Global Opportunities Fund (OBEGX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBEGX achieves a 29.71% return, which is significantly higher than CSUAX's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, OBEGX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 12.23%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.32% annualized return.


OBEGX

1D
1.59%
1M
2.49%
YTD
29.71%
6M
27.43%
1Y
48.74%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*
12.23%

CSUAX

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
9.88%
6M
10.52%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBEGX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OBEGX
Oberweis Global Opportunities Fund
29.71%19.32%10.72%6.40%-26.76%20.80%55.68%25.67%-25.62%33.35%
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
9.88%14.30%8.30%2.09%-5.20%16.24%-1.65%24.26%-5.83%17.99%

Correlation

The correlation between OBEGX and CSUAX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2004

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between OBEGX and CSUAX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBEGX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBEGX
OBEGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
OBEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
OBEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CSUAX
CSUAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CSUAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSUAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSUAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CSUAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSUAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBEGX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis Global Opportunities Fund (OBEGX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OBEGXCSUAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

3.05

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

9.69

+5.79

OBEGX vs. CSUAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBEGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the CSUAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBEGX and CSUAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OBEGX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBEGX drawdown since its inception was -83.07%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBEGX and CSUAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBEGXCSUAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.07%

-52.20%

-30.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-5.99%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.41%

-14.95%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-20.45%

-19.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

-35.05%

-6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-3.03%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-8.43%

-25.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

1.87%

+1.27%

Volatility

OBEGX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison

Oberweis Global Opportunities Fund (OBEGX) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.40%. This indicates that OBEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBEGXCSUAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

3.40%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

7.99%

+9.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.24%

9.86%

+11.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.34%

12.99%

+10.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

14.92%

+7.77%

OBEGX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBEGX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBEGX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison

OBEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.76%, more than CSUAX's 7.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSUAX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
7.36%8.09%2.23%2.17%3.55%2.95%1.30%1.52%2.08%5.00%2.04%6.20%
OBEGX
Oberweis Global Opportunities Fund
9.76%12.66%0.00%0.00%2.64%25.09%5.80%0.00%6.68%13.37%1.12%14.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBEGX and CSUAX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBEGX has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to CSUAX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBEGX dropped -83.07% vs CSUAX's -52.20%.

OBEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBEGX and CSUAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer