OBCHX vs. BGCBX
OBCHX (Oberweis China Opportunities Fund) and BGCBX (Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, OBCHX returned 26.34%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for BGCBX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OBCHX charges 2.03%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BGCBX.
Performance
OBCHX vs. BGCBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OBCHX achieves a 30.18% return, which is significantly higher than BGCBX's -2.17% return.
OBCHX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 30.18%
- 6M
- 31.49%
- 1Y
- 61.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
BGCBX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 19.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OBCHX vs. BGCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OBCHX Oberweis China Opportunities Fund | 30.18% | 40.89% | 7.28% | -7.70% | -37.21% | -8.24% |
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund | -2.17% | 36.51% | 9.74% | -18.00% | -28.56% | -17.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between OBCHX and BGCBX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2021 | 0.79 |
The correlation between OBCHX and BGCBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OBCHX vs. BGCBX — Risk / Return Rank
OBCHX
BGCBX
OBCHX vs. BGCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis China Opportunities Fund (OBCHX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OBCHX | BGCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.85 | 1.11 | +1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 1.61 | +1.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.20 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.36 | 1.31 | +5.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.09 | 3.29 | +12.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OBCHX | BGCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 1.11 | +1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | -0.25 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
OBCHX vs. BGCBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OBCHX drawdown since its inception was -74.03%, which is greater than BGCBX's maximum drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBCHX and BGCBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OBCHX | BGCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.03% | -59.07% | -14.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -13.48% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.88% | -28.54% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -29.97% | +16.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.71% | -38.30% | +12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 5.36% | -1.57% |
Volatility
OBCHX vs. BGCBX - Volatility Comparison
Oberweis China Opportunities Fund (OBCHX) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) at 4.75%. This indicates that OBCHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OBCHX | BGCBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 4.75% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.73% | 12.23% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 17.91% | +4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 27.01% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 27.01% | -1.90% |
OBCHX vs. BGCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OBCHX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than BGCBX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
OBCHX vs. BGCBX - Dividend Comparison
OBCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than BGCBX's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund | 0.93% | 0.91% | 2.03% | 1.50% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OBCHX Oberweis China Opportunities Fund | 0.78% | 1.01% | 2.16% | 0.46% | 1.22% | 41.65% | 11.50% | 3.37% | 26.11% | 6.26% | 0.81% | 11.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OBCHX and BGCBX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OBCHX has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to BGCBX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBCHX dropped -74.03% vs BGCBX's -59.07%.
OBCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OBCHX and BGCBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer