OBCHX vs. MCSMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

OBCHX (Oberweis China Opportunities Fund) and MCSMX (Matthews China Small Companies Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, OBCHX returned 11.31%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for MCSMX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OBCHX charges 2.03%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for MCSMX.

Performance

OBCHX vs. MCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oberweis China Opportunities Fund (OBCHX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBCHX achieves a 36.11% return, which is significantly lower than MCSMX's 53.58% return. Over the past 10 years, OBCHX has underperformed MCSMX with an annualized return of 11.31%, while MCSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.01% annualized return.

OBCHX

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 6.51%
• YTD: 36.11%
• 6M: 36.07%
• 1Y: 66.40%
• 3Y*: 25.56%
• 5Y*: 2.50%
• 10Y*: 11.31%

MCSMX

• 1D: 3.72%
• 1M: 9.06%
• YTD: 53.58%
• 6M: 52.25%
• 1Y: 85.81%
• 3Y*: 22.20%
• 5Y*: 3.08%
• 10Y*: 15.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBCHX vs. MCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OBCHX Oberweis China Opportunities Fund	36.11%	40.89%	7.28%	-7.70%	-37.21%	-5.16%	57.06%	36.32%	-25.94%	54.99%
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	53.58%	28.85%	2.82%	-17.50%	-31.25%	6.71%	82.73%	35.41%	-17.65%	53.71%

Correlation

The correlation between OBCHX and MCSMX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011	0.83

The correlation between OBCHX and MCSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OBCHX vs. MCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBCHX

OBCHX Risk / Return Rank: 86
OBCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
OBCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
OBCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
OBCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
OBCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

MCSMX

MCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 94
MCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
MCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
MCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBCHX vs. MCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oberweis China Opportunities Fund (OBCHX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OBCHX	MCSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	3.50	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	4.36	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.60	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.55	6.95	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.28	19.94	-3.66

OBCHX vs. MCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the MCSMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBCHX and MCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OBCHX vs. MCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBCHX drawdown since its inception was -74.03%, which is greater than MCSMX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBCHX and MCSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	OBCHX	MCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.03%	-55.77%	-18.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-12.32%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.88%	-26.50%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.17%	-53.98%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.47%	-55.77%	-3.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.27%	0.00%	-9.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.68%	-20.16%	-5.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	4.26%	-0.40%

Volatility

OBCHX vs. MCSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Oberweis China Opportunities Fund (OBCHX) is 10.04%, while Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX) has a volatility of 13.03%. This indicates that OBCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OBCHX	MCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.04%	13.03%	-2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.58%	20.76%	-3.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.26%	24.46%	-1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.96%	24.88%	+2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.23%	22.57%	+2.66%

OBCHX vs. MCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBCHX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than MCSMX's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

OBCHX vs. MCSMX - Dividend Comparison

OBCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than MCSMX's 1.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	1.45%	2.23%	1.35%	2.36%	1.78%	26.38%	16.98%	1.03%	2.25%	5.66%	4.79%	8.88%
OBCHX Oberweis China Opportunities Fund	0.74%	1.01%	2.16%	0.46%	1.22%	41.65%	11.50%	3.37%	26.11%	6.26%	0.81%	11.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OBCHX and MCSMX in my portfolio?

OBCHX and MCSMX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OBCHX or MCSMX?

MCSMX has higher volatility (13.03%) compared to OBCHX (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBCHX dropped -74.03% vs MCSMX's -55.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MCSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.