PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAYMX vs. FSWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAYMX vs. FSWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OAYMX achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than FSWCX's 16.21% return.


OAYMX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
2.18%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*

FSWCX

1D
0.13%
1M
7.42%
YTD
16.21%
6M
18.61%
1Y
38.95%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
14.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAYMX vs. FSWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
-0.86%14.35%16.24%31.18%-13.19%34.49%13.02%27.25%-12.66%0.17%
FSWCX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
16.21%22.50%19.90%12.64%-3.50%30.43%-4.44%29.09%-11.54%0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between OAYMX and FSWCX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.93

The correlation between OAYMX and FSWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAYMX vs. FSWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAYMX
OAYMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
OAYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
OAYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FSWCX
FSWCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAYMX vs. FSWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OAYMXFSWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.67

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

7.06

-5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

24.81

-20.18

OAYMX vs. FSWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAYMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FSWCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAYMX and FSWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OAYMXFSWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

3.64

-2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.86

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.59

+0.03

Drawdowns

OAYMX vs. FSWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAYMX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FSWCX drawdown of -41.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAYMX and FSWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAYMXFSWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-41.41%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-5.77%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.02%

-16.13%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-19.62%

-3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

0.00%

-3.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-5.57%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.63%

+1.06%

Volatility

OAYMX vs. FSWCX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) at 2.77%. This indicates that OAYMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAYMXFSWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.77%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

7.64%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

11.19%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

16.70%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

20.78%

-0.26%

OAYMX vs. FSWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAYMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWCX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAYMX vs. FSWCX - Dividend Comparison

OAYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than FSWCX's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSWCX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
6.37%7.40%8.86%9.68%12.90%5.71%2.55%2.37%3.84%0.07%
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
1.13%1.12%1.30%1.19%1.16%1.64%0.27%8.44%8.35%4.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAYMX and FSWCX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAYMX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FSWCX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAYMX dropped -40.09% vs FSWCX's -41.41%.

FSWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAYMX and FSWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer