PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OAYMX vs. FALGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OAYMX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OAYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-2.46%
1Y
8.89%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*

FALGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OAYMX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
-1.94%14.35%16.24%31.18%-13.19%34.49%13.02%27.25%-12.66%21.28%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
0.00%19.09%18.68%22.88%-8.40%25.20%8.27%31.01%-8.88%16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between OAYMX and FALGX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2016

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between OAYMX and FALGX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OAYMX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OAYMX
OAYMX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
OAYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OAYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
OAYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
OAYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
OAYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FALGX
FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OAYMX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OAYMXFALGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.46

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

2.54

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

4.12

-0.85

OAYMX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OAYMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OAYMX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OAYMX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OAYMX drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAYMX and FALGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OAYMXFALGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-64.07%

+23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-5.06%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.02%

-21.78%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-21.78%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.45%

-4.20%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-14.41%

+8.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.92%

-0.11%

Volatility

OAYMX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

Oakmark Fund Advisor Class (OAYMX) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that OAYMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OAYMXFALGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

0.00%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

3.52%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.20%

7.81%

+5.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

16.62%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

18.66%

+1.83%

OAYMX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OAYMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

OAYMX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

OAYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than FALGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
5.76%5.76%0.00%3.20%1.91%6.44%5.25%8.39%16.99%6.42%1.85%2.74%
OAYMX
Oakmark Fund Advisor Class
1.15%1.12%1.30%1.19%1.16%1.64%0.27%8.44%8.35%4.22%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OAYMX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OAYMX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAYMX dropped -40.09% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

FALGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OAYMX and FALGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer