OASC vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

OASC (OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OASC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. OASC is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past year, OASC returned 30.19% vs 68.34% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. OASC charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

OASC vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OASC achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.

OASC

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -0.84%
• 6M: 13.40%
• YTD: 17.52%
• 1Y: 30.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OASC vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF	17.52%	8.91%	10.35%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	-1.76%	-35.63%

Correlation

The correlation between OASC and BITI is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2024	-0.40

Return for Risk

OASC vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OASC

OASC Risk / Return Rank: 71
OASC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
OASC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
OASC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
OASC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
OASC Martin Ratio Rank: 83

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OASC vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OASC	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.56	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.13	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.26	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	2.72	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.94	6.78	+6.17

OASC vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OASC Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OASC and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OASC vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OASC drawdown since its inception was -27.00%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OASC and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	OASC	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.00%	-92.16%	+65.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-25.28%	+17.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-85.94%	+82.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-68.34%	+62.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.34%	10.11%	-7.77%

Volatility

OASC vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) is 5.69%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that OASC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OASC	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	11.38%	-5.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.28%	34.25%	-20.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.46%	44.14%	-25.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.87%	52.28%	-31.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.87%	52.28%	-31.41%

OASC vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

OASC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

OASC vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

OASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF	0.45%	0.53%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OASC and BITI in my portfolio?

OASC and BITI have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OASC or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to OASC (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OASC dropped -27.00% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, OASC or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 68.34% vs 30.19% for OASC. On fees, OASC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, OASC has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OASC or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 68.34% return vs 30.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OASC or BITI?

OASC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OASC or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.45% for OASC.

What is the main difference between OASC and BITI?

OASC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for OASC and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.