PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OARK vs. YMAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OARK vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OARK achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly higher than YMAG's -3.07% return.


OARK

1D
-1.92%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
3.98%
6M
0.77%
1Y
16.90%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
10Y*

YMAG

1D
-0.87%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
-3.07%
6M
-4.07%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OARK vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OARK and YMAG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.70

The correlation between OARK and YMAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OARK vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OARK
OARK Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
OARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
OARK Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
OARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
OARK Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OARK vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OARKYMAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.17

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

3.84

-2.14

OARK vs. YMAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the YMAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OARK and YMAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OARK vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, which is greater than YMAG's maximum drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and YMAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OARKYMAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

-25.96%

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.26%

-14.38%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.62%

-9.15%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-4.56%

-5.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

4.35%

+5.61%

Volatility

OARK vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) at 5.86%. This indicates that OARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YMAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OARKYMAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

5.86%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.07%

12.60%

+8.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.55%

16.68%

+11.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.95%

20.98%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.95%

20.98%

+9.97%

OARK vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

OARK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

OARK vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison

OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 63.14%, more than YMAG's 53.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
63.14%61.86%47.86%45.03%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
53.52%52.27%35.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OARK and YMAG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OARK has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to YMAG (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OARK dropped -35.48% vs YMAG's -25.96%.

On 1-year performance, OARK leads with 16.90% vs 16.69% for YMAG. On fees, OARK is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OARK has performed better with a 16.90% return vs 16.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OARK is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

OARK has the higher dividend yield at 63.14%, compared with 53.52% for YMAG.

OARK is categorized as Options Trading, while YMAG is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for OARK and 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OARK and YMAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer