PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OARK vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OARK vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OARK achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than ISWN's 4.28% return.


OARK

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.36%
YTD
6.11%
6M
4.26%
1Y
32.85%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
10Y*

ISWN

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.01%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.94%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OARK vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
6.11%20.37%7.32%20.12%-9.11%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
4.28%23.23%-3.96%8.19%-1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between OARK and ISWN is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2022

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OARK vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OARK
OARK Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
OARK Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
OARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
OARK Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OARK vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OARKISWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

1.38

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

4.67

-1.30

OARK vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OARK Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OARK and ISWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OARKISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.09

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.01

+0.39

Drawdowns

OARK vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, which is greater than ISWN's maximum drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and ISWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OARKISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

-32.35%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.26%

-9.63%

-13.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.48%

-13.77%

-21.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

-4.03%

-2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.58%

-16.17%

+5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.77%

2.85%

+6.92%

Volatility

OARK vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) at 4.67%. This indicates that OARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OARKISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

4.67%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.93%

10.10%

+9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.07%

12.20%

+15.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.84%

11.67%

+19.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.84%

11.57%

+19.27%

OARK vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

OARK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

OARK vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.29%, more than ISWN's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.82%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
64.29%61.86%47.86%45.03%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OARK and ISWN have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OARK has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to ISWN (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OARK dropped -35.48% vs ISWN's -32.35%.

On 3-year performance, OARK leads with 14.35% vs 8.12% for ISWN. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ISWN has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OARK has performed better with a 14.35% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for OARK.

OARK has the higher dividend yield at 64.29%, compared with 2.82% for ISWN.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for OARK and 0.49% for ISWN.

OARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OARK and ISWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer