PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OARK vs. DMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OARK vs. DMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OARK vs. DMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
-7.83%20.37%7.32%20.12%-9.11%
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
1.79%9.13%12.74%12.25%-1.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OARK achieves a -7.83% return, which is significantly lower than DMAR's 1.79% return.


OARK

1D
5.56%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-7.83%
6M
-13.82%
1Y
32.36%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
10Y*

DMAR

1D
1.41%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.79%
6M
4.00%
1Y
12.53%
3Y*
11.15%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OARK vs. DMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OARK has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OARK vs. DMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OARK
OARK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
OARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
OARK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
OARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
OARK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAR
DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OARK vs. DMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OARKDMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

1.66

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

2.45

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.51

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.08

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.21

13.69

-10.48

OARK vs. DMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the DMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OARK and DMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OARKDMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

1.66

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

1.03

-0.77

Correlation

The correlation between OARK and DMAR is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

OARK vs. DMAR - Dividend Comparison

OARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.54%, while DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
OARK
YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
66.54%61.86%47.86%45.03%
DMAR
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OARK vs. DMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OARK drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, which is greater than DMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARK and DMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OARKDMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

-9.84%

-25.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.26%

-6.15%

-17.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.00%

-0.14%

-18.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-1.91%

-8.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.03%

0.93%

+8.10%

Volatility

OARK vs. DMAR - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF (OARK) has a higher volatility of 10.24% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) at 1.94%. This indicates that OARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OARKDMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.24%

1.94%

+8.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.12%

2.71%

+19.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.06%

7.59%

+25.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.13%

7.06%

+24.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.13%

7.05%

+24.08%