DMAR vs. SPY
DMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DMAR is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DMAR returned 7.74%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DMAR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
DMAR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMAR achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.
DMAR
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
DMAR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 7.21% | 9.13% | 12.74% | 12.25% | -5.48% | 7.04% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 22.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMAR and SPY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DMAR and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DMAR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DMAR
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DMAR
SPY
Financial Services
DMAR
SPY
Communication Services
DMAR
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
DMAR
SPY
Healthcare
DMAR
SPY
Industrials
DMAR
SPY
Consumer Defensive
DMAR
SPY
Energy
DMAR
SPY
Utilities
DMAR
SPY
Real Estate
DMAR
SPY
Basic Materials
DMAR
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMAR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
DMAR
SPY
DMAR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMAR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.04 | 1.43 | +0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.68 | 3.16 | +6.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 62.37 | 14.72 | +47.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMAR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07 | 2.38 | +1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.82 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.59 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
DMAR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMAR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -55.19% | +45.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.53% | -8.88% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.16% | -18.76% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.84% | -24.50% | +14.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.70% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -9.05% | +7.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.24% | 1.91% | -1.67% |
Volatility
DMAR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) is 0.67%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that DMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMAR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 2.84% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.74% | 8.90% | -6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 11.83% | -8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 17.05% | -10.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.97% | 17.94% | -10.97% |
DMAR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DMAR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
DMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMAR and SPY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to DMAR (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMAR dropped -9.84% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 7.74% for DMAR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAR.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for DMAR.
DMAR is categorized as Options Trading, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DMAR and 0.09% for SPY.
DMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.07 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMAR and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer