DMAR vs. CPSM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM).

DMAR and CPSM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DMAR is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Mar 18, 2021. CPSM is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on May 1, 2024.

Performance

DMAR vs. CPSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DMAR vs. CPSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March	1.79%	9.13%	12.06%
CPSM Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May	0.81%	7.21%	6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DMAR achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than CPSM's 0.81% return.

DMAR

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 12.53%
• 3Y*: 11.15%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: —

CPSM

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: 7.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DMAR vs. CPSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DMAR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSM's 0.69% expense ratio.

DMAR

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March

CPSM

Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May

Return for Risk

DMAR vs. CPSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DMAR

DMAR Risk / Return Rank: 87
DMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
DMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
DMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 93

CPSM

CPSM Risk / Return Rank: 75
CPSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
CPSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
CPSM Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CPSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CPSM Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DMAR vs. CPSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DMAR	CPSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.10	+0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.70	+0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.45	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	1.51	+0.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.69	9.75	+3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DMAR vs. CPSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the CPSM Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DMAR and CPSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DMAR	CPSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	1.10	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	1.47	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between DMAR and CPSM is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

DMAR vs. CPSM - Dividend Comparison

Neither DMAR nor CPSM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DMAR vs. CPSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.84%, which is greater than CPSM's maximum drawdown of -5.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMAR and CPSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	DMAR	CPSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.84%	-5.19%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	-4.99%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.08%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-0.22%	-1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	0.77%	+0.16%

Volatility

DMAR vs. CPSM - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - March (DMAR) has a higher volatility of 1.94% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - May (CPSM) at 0.68%. This indicates that DMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DMAR	CPSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.94%	0.68%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	1.18%	+1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.59%	6.69%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.06%	5.31%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.05%	5.31%	+1.74%