PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OARDX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OARDX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Rising Dividends Fund (OARDX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OARDX achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, OARDX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 12.60%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.79% annualized return.


OARDX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.66%
YTD
6.47%
6M
6.42%
1Y
20.83%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
12.60%

MUHLX

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
11.53%
6M
11.87%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
13.92%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OARDX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OARDX
Invesco Rising Dividends Fund
6.47%17.43%19.40%17.73%-12.68%26.52%13.34%29.59%-6.55%17.48%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
11.53%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%28.98%11.96%14.39%-13.29%18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between OARDX and MUHLX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 1988

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between OARDX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OARDX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OARDX
OARDX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
OARDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OARDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
OARDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
OARDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
OARDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OARDX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Rising Dividends Fund (OARDX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OARDXMUHLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

2.40

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.94

9.10

+1.84

OARDX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OARDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OARDX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OARDXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

1.76

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.73

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.63

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.52

-0.44

Drawdowns

OARDX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OARDX drawdown since its inception was -69.57%, which is greater than MUHLX's maximum drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OARDX and MUHLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OARDXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.57%

-62.05%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-10.23%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.45%

-18.63%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.45%

-18.63%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.69%

-40.85%

+4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.55%

+3.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-10.77%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.69%

-0.58%

Volatility

OARDX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Rising Dividends Fund (OARDX) is 2.81%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that OARDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OARDXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.17%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

10.95%

-2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.05%

13.98%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

14.62%

+2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

17.05%

+1.16%

OARDX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OARDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

OARDX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

OARDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than MUHLX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
2.99%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%
OARDX
Invesco Rising Dividends Fund
7.56%8.07%12.72%7.63%6.04%12.60%2.49%4.06%9.13%10.38%6.04%7.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


OARDX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUHLX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to OARDX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OARDX dropped -69.57% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

OARDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OARDX and MUHLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer