OALC vs. ELCV
OALC (OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF) and ELCV (Eventide High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OALC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent, while ELCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Eventide. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OALC returned 30.23% vs 32.38% for ELCV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
OALC vs. ELCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a 13.67% return, which is significantly lower than ELCV's 22.21% return.
OALC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 30.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELCV
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 22.21%
- 6M
- 21.66%
- 1Y
- 32.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OALC vs. ELCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF | 13.67% | 20.36% | 2.02% |
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 22.21% | 9.96% | -0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between OALC and ELCV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between OALC and ELCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OALC vs. ELCV — Risk / Return Rank
OALC
ELCV
OALC vs. ELCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OALC | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 6.18 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.26 | 21.66 | -6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OALC vs. ELCV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than ELCV's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and ELCV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OALC | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -18.38% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.42% | -5.05% | -3.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | 0.00% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -3.70% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.45% | +0.44% |
Volatility
OALC vs. ELCV - Volatility Comparison
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Eventide High Dividend ETF (ELCV) at 4.47%. This indicates that OALC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OALC | ELCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 4.47% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.79% | 9.21% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 11.89% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.48% | +1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.48% | +1.85% |
OALC vs. ELCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OALC and ELCV have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
OALC vs. ELCV - Dividend Comparison
OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than ELCV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELCV Eventide High Dividend ETF | 1.75% | 2.34% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.70% | 0.40% | 0.40% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OALC and ELCV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OALC has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to ELCV (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OALC dropped -26.82% vs ELCV's -18.38%.
On 1-year performance, ELCV leads with 32.38% vs 30.23% for OALC. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, ELCV has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ELCV has performed better with a 32.38% return vs 30.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OALC and ELCV have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
ELCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.53% for OALC.
OALC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ELCV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Eventide.
ELCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OALC and ELCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer