OALC vs. DBO
OALC (OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OALC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. OALC is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OALC returned 23.85%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OALC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
OALC vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
OALC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
OALC vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF | 15.60% | 20.36% | 19.64% | 22.03% | -18.08% | -0.54% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | -8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between OALC and DBO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.07 |
The correlation between OALC and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OALC vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OALC
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
OALC
DBO
-
Financial Services
OALC
DBO
Consumer Cyclical
OALC
DBO
-
Communication Services
OALC
DBO
-
Industrials
OALC
DBO
-
Healthcare
OALC
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
OALC
DBO
-
Utilities
OALC
DBO
-
Energy
OALC
DBO
-
Basic Materials
OALC
DBO
-
Real Estate
OALC
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OALC vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
OALC
DBO
OALC vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OALC | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.38 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 4.44 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.19 | 9.02 | +9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OALC | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 2.34 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.02 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
OALC vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OALC | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -90.18% | +63.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.42% | -18.19% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -28.20% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -51.38% | +50.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -62.25% | +55.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 8.92% | -7.10% |
Volatility
OALC vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) is 3.42%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that OALC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OALC | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 12.61% | -9.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 28.20% | -18.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 34.46% | -21.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 32.29% | -15.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 31.78% | -14.50% |
OALC vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
OALC vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.70% | 0.40% | 0.40% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OALC and DBO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to OALC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OALC dropped -26.82% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, OALC leads with 23.85% vs 21.86% for DBO. On fees, OALC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, OALC has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OALC has performed better with a 23.85% return vs 21.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OALC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.53% for OALC.
OALC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OALC and 0.78% for DBO.
OALC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OALC and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer