OAKI vs. FID
OAKI (Oakmark International Large Cap ETF) and FID (First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. OAKI is actively managed, while FID is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OAKI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FID.
Performance
OAKI vs. FID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKI achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than FID's 7.95% return.
OAKI
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FID
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 18.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- —
OAKI vs. FID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OAKI Oakmark International Large Cap ETF | 2.40% | 0.73% |
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 7.95% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKI and FID is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKI vs. FID — Risk / Return Rank
OAKI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FID
OAKI vs. FID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark International Large Cap ETF (OAKI) and First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OAKI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OAKI vs. FID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKI drawdown since its inception was -13.94%, smaller than the maximum FID drawdown of -39.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKI and FID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.94% | -39.79% | +25.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.82% | -1.67% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.70% | -8.40% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
OAKI vs. FID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKI | FID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 10.21% | +8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 17.05% | +1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 18.89% | -0.58% |
OAKI vs. FID - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FID's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKI vs. FID - Dividend Comparison
OAKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than FID's 4.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FID First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 4.20% | 4.30% | 4.31% | 4.19% | 4.22% | 3.76% | 3.91% | 3.70% | 1.74% |
OAKI Oakmark International Large Cap ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKI and FID have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FID is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FID is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for OAKI.
FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 0.04% for OAKI.
They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for OAKI and 0.60% for FID.
Find the right allocation for OAKI and FID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer