OAKGX vs. OANCX
OAKGX (Oakmark Global Fund) and OANCX (Oakmark Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - OAKGX is a Global Equities fund managed by Oakmark, while OANCX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Oakmark. Over the past 5 years, OAKGX returned 5.66%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OANCX. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OAKGX charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for OANCX.
Performance
OAKGX vs. OANCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKGX achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than OANCX's 0.56% return.
OAKGX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
OANCX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- —
OAKGX vs. OANCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKGX Oakmark Global Fund | 1.84% | 21.19% | 2.53% | 17.36% | -16.86% | 30.47% | 38.29% |
OANCX Oakmark Bond Fund | 0.56% | 7.05% | 3.19% | 6.12% | -11.36% | 0.49% | 5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKGX and OANCX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2020 | 0.22 |
The correlation between OAKGX and OANCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKGX vs. OANCX — Risk / Return Rank
OAKGX
OANCX
OAKGX vs. OANCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Fund (OAKGX) and Oakmark Bond Fund (OANCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAKGX | OANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.31 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.44 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 7.48 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKGX | OANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.71 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.19 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.36 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
OAKGX vs. OANCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKGX drawdown since its inception was -60.43%, which is greater than OANCX's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKGX and OANCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKGX | OANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.43% | -15.58% | -44.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -2.52% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.75% | -5.50% | -10.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.54% | -15.58% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -1.25% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -4.70% | -4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 0.82% | +2.79% |
Volatility
OAKGX vs. OANCX - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Global Fund (OAKGX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Oakmark Bond Fund (OANCX) at 1.21%. This indicates that OAKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OANCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKGX | OANCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 1.21% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 2.58% | +7.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 3.59% | +9.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 5.02% | +13.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.66% | 4.67% | +15.99% |
OAKGX vs. OANCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than OANCX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKGX vs. OANCX - Dividend Comparison
OAKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than OANCX's 4.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKGX Oakmark Global Fund | 1.09% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 4.35% | 0.75% | 17.98% | 0.16% | 3.71% | 14.80% | 7.50% | 1.07% | 2.87% |
OANCX Oakmark Bond Fund | 4.87% | 3.76% | 4.53% | 3.82% | 2.97% | 3.07% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKGX and OANCX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OAKGX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to OANCX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKGX dropped -60.43% vs OANCX's -15.58%.
OANCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAKGX and OANCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer