OAKBX vs. PRVBX
OAKBX (Oakmark Equity and Income Fund) and PRVBX (Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio) are both mutual funds - OAKBX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Oakmark, while PRVBX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Permanent Portfolio. Over the past 10 years, OAKBX returned 9.32%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for PRVBX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OAKBX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for PRVBX.
Performance
OAKBX vs. PRVBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKBX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than PRVBX's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, OAKBX has outperformed PRVBX with an annualized return of 9.32%, while PRVBX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
OAKBX
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- -0.28%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
PRVBX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.09%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
OAKBX vs. PRVBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKBX Oakmark Equity and Income Fund | 0.21% | 11.05% | 8.73% | 17.39% | -12.94% | 29.12% | 8.68% | 19.39% | -8.38% | 14.43% |
PRVBX Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio | 1.09% | 5.66% | 5.78% | 6.91% | -5.91% | 2.93% | 9.88% | 9.29% | 2.01% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKBX and PRVBX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 1995 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, OAKBX and PRVBX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKBX vs. PRVBX — Risk / Return Rank
OAKBX
PRVBX
OAKBX vs. PRVBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Equity and Income Fund (OAKBX) and Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OAKBX | PRVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.51 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.01 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.57 | 11.61 | -8.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OAKBX vs. PRVBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKBX drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, which is greater than PRVBX's maximum drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKBX and PRVBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKBX | PRVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.31% | -16.91% | -14.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -1.51% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.91% | -1.51% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | -8.22% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.19% | -16.91% | -13.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -0.23% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -0.72% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 0.39% | +1.75% |
Volatility
OAKBX vs. PRVBX - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Equity and Income Fund (OAKBX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio (PRVBX) at 0.64%. This indicates that OAKBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRVBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKBX | PRVBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 0.64% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.35% | 1.45% | +4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.76% | 1.80% | +6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.13% | 2.36% | +9.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 4.35% | +8.65% |
OAKBX vs. PRVBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKBX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVBX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKBX vs. PRVBX - Dividend Comparison
OAKBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than PRVBX's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKBX Oakmark Equity and Income Fund | 2.20% | 2.16% | 2.05% | 2.28% | 1.44% | 14.26% | 4.17% | 9.07% | 10.05% | 8.09% | 4.13% | 6.53% |
PRVBX Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio | 4.13% | 4.18% | 3.61% | 3.16% | 1.83% | 0.85% | 4.73% | 2.51% | 1.71% | 3.30% | 3.27% | 5.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKBX and PRVBX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OAKBX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to PRVBX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKBX dropped -31.31% vs PRVBX's -16.91%.
PRVBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAKBX and PRVBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer